Determination for Fast Rent (Swindon)




2.1 23 SEPTEMBER 2021


Fast Rent (Swindon) Ltd holds a restricted items automobile operator’s licence authorising using three automobiles from a website in Wotton Bassett, Wiltshire. Three automobiles are in possession. The licence got here in to power in 2001. The only real director is Robert Pasqualitto.

The operator was referred to as to public inquiry on 6 March 2014 following a DVSA upkeep investigation that discovered shortcomings. The choice was as follows:

Pursuant to findings Underneath Part 26(1)(c)(iii), (ca) and (f) of the 1995 Act, the Licence is Curtailed to 2 Automobiles with speedy impact till 23:59 hours on twenty ninth Might 2014.

S22RAP is the nominated automobile to be faraway from the Licence.

The next Undertakings have been hooked up to the Licence:

The automobile disc for S22RAP shall be returned to the Workplace of the Site visitors Commissioner, Jubilee Home, Croydon Road, Bristol BS5 0GB by twentieth March 2014.

Authentic financial institution statements or financial institution stamped print outs are to be lodged with the Workplace of the Site visitors Commissioner, Jubilee Home, Croydon Road, Bristol BS5 0GB by twentieth March 2014.

The Director shall attend a longtime someday operator licensing consciousness seminar offered by a commerce or recognised coaching organisation by no later than twenty second Might 2014. Proof of attendance on the mentioned course is to be acquired by the Workplace of the Site visitors Commissioner, Jubilee Home, Croydon Road, Bristol, BS5 0GB inside 7 days of attendance.

On 30 November 2020, automobile LK08HLV was encountered by DVSA. It was issued with a right away prohibition for 3 gadgets:

  1. Tyre reduce in order that cords had been uncovered

  2. A second tyre reduce in order that cords had been uncovered

  3. Severely contaminated brake lining materials and braking effectivity impaired (examined to verify) o/s/r axle 2

The issuing Automobile Examiner annotated the prohibition to the impact that the defects had been brought on by a big failure of compliance methods.

On 10 December 2020, Automobile Examiners John Burningham and Gary Beck visited the working centre and located shortcomings throughout a variety of areas. The Automobile Examiners couldn’t find the said upkeep supplier, Maxfield Motors. A telephone quantity supplied by the operator for the maintainer was answered by a panorama gardener. Mr Pasqualitto admitted, in interview below warning, to creating the data himself.

DVSA Site visitors Examiner Gregor Bell visited the operator on 16 March 2021. Mr Bell discovered that the tachograph downloading gear was not getting used. Driving licences had been checked yearly, not quarterly. Mr Bell discovered no proof of any vital drivers hours or tachograph infringements.

These studies induced me to name the operator to public inquiry.


Mr Robert Pasqualitto attended the inquiry unrepresented. I confirmed with him that he was conscious of the potential outcomes from the listening to. Automobile Examiner Gary Beck attended for DVSA. I had additionally referred to as John Burningham however he had since left the Company.

Proceedings had been recorded and a transcript could be made out there if required. I file right here solely the related elements of the proof. In getting ready this determination, I’ve taken as reference my public inquiry bundle, the operator’s compliance paperwork, my notes and I’ve listened to the digital recording.

I confirmed that Mr Pasqualitto had the general public inquiry bundle with him. I requested why he had didn’t adjust to the path within the call-in letter with compliance paperwork supplied solely on the morning of the inquiry quite than seven days prematurely. Mr Pasqualitto instructed me that he had been unwell with Covid and never in work the earlier week. He had picked up the data that morning. He had forgotten to deliver the finance paperwork. I confirmed that Mr Pasqualitto was conscious of the potential outcomes and had made a constructive determination to not be legally represented.

Automobile Examiner Gary Beck launched himself. Mr Beck confirmed that he had been current on the interview below warning performed by Mr Burningham and will undertake the file of it (at web page 110 of my bundle) as proof. Mr Pasqualitto had no questions for him. Mr Pasqualitto didn’t recognise Mr Beck however Mr Beck confirmed that he was current; he could look totally different as a result of he was now sporting a shirt and tie and was beforehand sporting a face-covering.

I referred Mr Pasqualitto to the inspection report for a Mitsubishi 7.5 tonne automobile S22RAP dated 27 July 2021. The automobile had quite a few security essential defects that had not been repaired. The motive force had signed a disclaimer to permit the automobile to be launched to him. Mr Pasqualitto instructed me that the damaged spring had been changed. It had failed the brake check as a result of the pads had been low. I requested below what authority a driver would signal a disclaimer to drive a identified unroadworthy automobile on the street. I requested for proof that the defects had been rectified. I used to be instructed that the receipts had been within the workplace. I requested why Motus (the upkeep supplier) didn’t restore the defects. I used to be instructed that it was not about cash however lack of capability at Motus.

Mr Pasqualitto instructed me that the enterprise was instrument and plant rent. Seventy % of the enterprise relied on the HGVs. Maxfield Motors had simply disappeared a couple of yr earlier than the Examiners visited. I requested what inspection was performed earlier than he accomplished the PMI studies. Mr Pasqualitto described what sounded to me like a drivers each day walk-round verify. He had a workshop however no pit or something like that. He had borrowed a decelerometer from Basset Service Station. He hadn’t checked whether or not it was calibrated. I requested Mr Pasqualitto to explain an inspection routine. He mentioned he began with the tyres, then the lights, the washers the horn. He would get another person to get beneath it to verify “nothing was hanging off it”.

I requested Mr Pasqualitto once more to take me by way of an inspection process. He instructed me he would begin on the entrance and work to the again and get beneath as a lot as he may. He had a background as a automobile mechanic. He had by no means attended any coaching on easy methods to examine a truck.

Mr Pasqualitto solid the signatures as a result of “he wished it to be proper”. I requested why there had been a delay shifting upkeep suppliers from Maxfield to Motus. He had tried the Iveco seller after which Imperial (which had turn into Motus) however they’d been unreliable with automobiles ready for weeks for work to be carried out. A brand new firm, Sparks, had been to see him and he puzzled whether or not he ought to transfer to them. I famous that the 27 July PMI for S22RAP mentioned that the tachograph calibration was due on 30 July however the certificates was not issued till 1 September. They’d forgotten to take it.

Mr Pasqualitto was attempting to be compliant but it surely was an excessive amount of for him. He had acquired his first automobile with a digital tachograph some years in the past. I referred to the report of Site visitors Examiner Gregor Bell at web page 121 the place it said “Tachomaster sensible terminal simply bought awaiting connection. Downloading not achieved but”. Mr Pasqualitto didn’t realise he needed to obtain them. He purchased the downloader as quickly as Mr Bell instructed him however he couldn’t function it so he now had HTC are available in each month to do it.

I requested in regards to the future plans. Mr Pasqualitto wished to get issues proper then retire. There have been plans for that to occur by the top of the yr, presumably the beginning of subsequent yr. He was sole director and sole shareholder.

I reviewed once more the upkeep data. I requested for the first-use inspection for YK17LFA which had been bought in July. There hadn’t been one. I retired to think about the inspection studies intimately. Having achieved so, I decided that speedy motion was obligatory on security grounds and pursuant to a discovering below Part 26(1)(b), that upkeep preparations had been modified with out being notified, I suspended the licence with impact from midnight, Friday 24 September 2021 till all three automobiles had been inspected by a franchised seller, with a laden curler brake check and all safety-related gadgets signed off as rectified. I reserved the rest of my determination.


The only real director admits that he has solid the upkeep documentation on a number of events. He has signed-off automobiles as roadworthy with none competent particular person having inspected them and with none under-vehicle inspection amenities. On one inspection, service brake efficiency is recorded at 49%, beneath the authorized minimal, and nonetheless signed off as roadworthy.

Following the DVSA investigation, inspections had been moved to Motus, a DAF franchised seller. That is the inspection abstract for S22RAP on 27 July 2021:

Seven defects have been recognized which want rectification. Amongst them is a failed brake check. A piece of a leaf spring is lacking. Moderately than have these defects repaired, the motive force indicators a disclaimer and takes the automobile away with these defects, some apparently safety-critical, nonetheless current:

It then seems that Mr Pasqualitto works his manner by way of the listing of jobs however no proof was supplied of that or over what timescale – the tachograph was not calibrated till 1 September 2021, over three months after first showing on a PMI and over a month after the calibration had really expired. Have been different defects rectified in a equally tardy trend? Or in any respect? Two aren’t initialled by Mr Pasqualitto. He instructed me that the brake check failure was right down to low brake pads. The friction coefficient of brake pads doesn’t typically change as they put on (assuming they aren’t right down to steel which isn’t indicated right here). There is no such thing as a detailed brake check printout as can be anticipated so it’s unattainable to know for sure what the problem was. Nevertheless, the abstract of the brake readings reveals that at the very least half the wheels locked so it might look like a particular downside with a single wheel maybe inflicting an imbalance. Or it may very well be brake bind brought on by seized parts. It may very well be all method of issues and there’s no manner of realizing, from the data out there, what the defect was and whether or not it was ever rectified. Having modified the brake pads, there was no confirmatory brake check. We merely have no idea whether or not this automobile, which was in service on the time of the listening to, nonetheless had a severe braking defect.

In relation to this automobile, all the motive force defect studies are both nil defect or annotated “all good”. Not one defect is recorded. That appears considerably at odds with these recognized on the July inspection. The motive force appears oblivious to the engine warning gentle on the sprint, the lacking wiper blade and the insecure seat. As regards to the sheets saved on a spike as proven at web page 107 of my transient, it appears extremely questionable whether or not any reported defect would ever generate any rectification motion.

Taking automobiles from the upkeep supplier with defects not rectified isn’t an remoted incident. I be aware the next file for automobile LK08HLV:

Once more, the brake check is failed and no rectification. That is the automobile which was prohibited on 30 November 2020 for severely contaminated brake lining materials and braking effectivity impaired on o/s/r axle 2. It may simply be an infinite coincidence however evidently Mr Pasqualitto could have modified the brake linings to have the prohibition eliminated however the core defect, the leaking hub oil seal which almost definitely induced the contamination, was not repaired. This seems to be a transparent indication of Mr Pasqualitto’s lack of technical capacity but he’s signing automobiles off as roadworthy.

So I’ve no hesitation find that, as on the time of the inquiry and for the earlier yr at the very least, this operator didn’t have in place preparations to make sure that automobiles had been match and serviceable and that drivers had been recording defects in writing. Part 26(1)(f) is made out and I connect vital weight.

Most automobiles have personal plates so it’s tough to inform their age. Nevertheless, automobile GN08OLC was specified on the licence on 28 August 2008. Having been first used after Might 2006, it’ll have been fitted by regulation with a digital tachograph. On 16 March 2021, Site visitors Examiner Bell notes that the Tachomaster terminal is awaiting connection, that downloading has “solely simply began” and that the operator has “not used the software program but”. Mr Pasqualitto instructed me that he had purchased the Tachomaster terminal on the recommendation of TE Bell presumably when notified of the go to. So, for over twelve years, this operator has didn’t adjust to the downloading necessities of Part 97D of the Transport Act 1968. It follows that there was no evaluation of the info from the automobile unit and so it’ll have been unattainable for the operator to know whether or not any driver has been driving with out their card within the tachograph head. Drivers have all types of motives for breaking the principles, typically private, typically quite simple comparable to needing to be house for the varsity run. Analysing solely the motive force card knowledge is barely doing half a job and essentially breaches the requirement to look at the principles on tachographs and drivers hours and hold correct data. Part 26(1)(f) is additional made out and I once more connect vital weight.

I flip now to the operator’s health to be the holder of a items automobile operator’s licence. The upkeep and tachograph failings are strongly destructive options. Extra destructive nonetheless is the operator’s fabrication of upkeep data throughout 2020. From web page 66 to 102 of my bundle, I can establish sixteen events when Mr Pasqualitto has solid a signature of a Mr Maxfield. Such an motion completely destroys the belief that should exist between the regulator and the regulated. I additionally soak up to account he operator’s failure to adjust to the instructions within the call-in letter to offer paperwork prematurely. Monetary proof has not been supplied in any respect. Mr Pasqualitto didn’t search authorized illustration which calls in to query whether or not he actually understood the severity of the scenario. I used to be additionally struck within the listening to by his obvious disengagement from the method till I made my determination to droop the fleet.

There are some positives. Inspections had been outsourced following the DVSA investigation and occurred roughly on time. I discovered no specific points with the data for Y1RAP, the 4-axle Scania beaver-tail. Newer automobiles had been bought. The Site visitors Examiner scored the site visitors administration methods as unsatisfactory however simply wanting the “report back to OTC” threshold and located no vital drivers hours issues. Mr Pasqualitto attended the listening to.

So I carry out a balancing train however the few positives can do nothing to counteract the destructive weight deriving from the forging of upkeep paperwork not to mention the opposite very severe failings. While this can be a restricted licence, I’m conscious that the enterprise isn’t viable as at the moment constructed with out using items automobiles. I’m additionally conscious that there are plans for a change of possession. Having happy myself by way of the suspension motion (which continues to be in place as I write this), I’m content material to permit an extended than regular interval for revocation to take impact.

Robert Pasqualitto is sole director and shareholder. It’s due to this fact applicable that I pierce the company veil and think about his conduct and that of the corporate as one. Disqualification motion after revocation isn’t automated however this case has a really severe aggravating function within the forgery of the upkeep paperwork. Additionally it is the operator’s second inquiry and the breaches throughout each site visitors and roadworthiness are very severe. I consult with paragraph 103 of the Senior Site visitors Commissioner’s statutory doc quantity 10 which signifies {that a} disqualification interval of between 5 and 10 years is suitable the place an operator intentionally places life in danger, knowingly operates unsafe automobiles or permits falsifications. The doc refers to tachographs however upkeep is equally severe. I soak up to account the sixteen solid data the place no significant inspection was carried out. I additionally soak up to account the automobile being pushed away from the upkeep supplier having failed a brake check. Twice. These steer me to the highest finish of the dimensions.

I didn’t particularly ask the query on the listening to however it’s apparent that disqualification of the corporate can be the top of the enterprise. I don’t wish to get in the best way of Mr Pasqualitto’s retirement; fairly the alternative the place working automobiles is anxious. So, while I disqualify him personally for ten years, my order of disqualification for the corporate is indefinite in that I’ll allow an software at any time for the disqualification to be lifted. Clearly, that might solely occur if I had been happy that the affect of Mr Pasqualitto was nowhere to be present in something to do with the operation of products automobiles.


Pursuant to findings below Part 26(1)(f), that there aren’t, and haven’t been, correct preparations for retaining automobiles match and serviceable nor for compliance with the principles on drivers hours and tachographs, the licence is revoked.

Pursuant to a discovering below Part 26(1)(h), materials change, in that the operator is not match to be the holder of a items automobile operator’s licence, the licence is revoked.

Having managed the road-safety danger by a interval of suspension till all automobiles are signed-off as roadworthy, revocation will take impact from 8 January 2022.

Having by his personal admission falsified a number of units of upkeep data and allowed automobiles to be faraway from upkeep suppliers with harmful defects current, Robert Pasqualitto is disqualified from making use of for or holding a items automobile operator’s licence in any site visitors space from 8 January 2022 for ten years.

Arising from the identical conduct, Fast Rent (Swindon) Ltd is disqualified from making use of for or holding a items automobile operator’s licence in any site visitors space from 8 January 2022 and indefinitely. The corporate has go away to use to have this order eliminated at any time on demonstration of a full and significant change accountable for the enterprise.

Kevin Rooney

Site visitors Commissioner

8 October 2021


Supply hyperlink